Obviously I'm shilling my own idea here, but I'm curious as to the level of trust that you place in Deep Research when it comes to such a big decision like stop/go on a start-up idea.
Did you share your deep research chat with someone with domain expertise to get their 15-minute input on a) you…
Obviously I'm shilling my own idea here, but I'm curious as to the level of trust that you place in Deep Research when it comes to such a big decision like stop/go on a start-up idea.
Did you share your deep research chat with someone with domain expertise to get their 15-minute input on a) your prompt and b) the highest signal part of its answer?
Imho, this would be v valuable and will become an increasingly common way of working
I wouldn't take Deep Research's answer at face value, but it's incredibly helpful at steering my thinking. But that's the same with people. If I'm looking to make a complex decision, I'll speak to many people, but I'll try to integrate their perspectives instead of blindly trusting one of them. So I find it very valuable, but as a thinking partner, not a source of final answers. And, on a couple of occasions, I did notice some minor mistakes (e.g. referencing a rule from FCA that isn't applied anymore but there's still a page online from 2005 describing it)
Love this. Thanks for the detailed breakdown.
Obviously I'm shilling my own idea here, but I'm curious as to the level of trust that you place in Deep Research when it comes to such a big decision like stop/go on a start-up idea.
Did you share your deep research chat with someone with domain expertise to get their 15-minute input on a) your prompt and b) the highest signal part of its answer?
Imho, this would be v valuable and will become an increasingly common way of working
(more on why here: https://thefuturenormal.substack.com/p/chatgpts-deep-research-and-thinking)
I wouldn't take Deep Research's answer at face value, but it's incredibly helpful at steering my thinking. But that's the same with people. If I'm looking to make a complex decision, I'll speak to many people, but I'll try to integrate their perspectives instead of blindly trusting one of them. So I find it very valuable, but as a thinking partner, not a source of final answers. And, on a couple of occasions, I did notice some minor mistakes (e.g. referencing a rule from FCA that isn't applied anymore but there's still a page online from 2005 describing it)